According to the Tibetan Tsong kha pa one of the eight difficult points in understanding Madhyamaka philosophy is the way in which Prasangika Madhyamaka does not accept even conventionally that reflexivity is an essential part of awareness - that in being aware there is also an awareness of being aware. One of the most systematic and detailed refutations of Tsong kha pa's approach to this issue can be found in the commentary to the ninth chapter of the Bodhicaryavatara by the rNying ma lama Mi pham (1846-1912), together with Mi pham's own replies to his subsequent critics. In the course of this Mi pham reveals a vision of what is going on in Madhyamaka which is rather different from the more familiar Tibetan approach of Tsong kha pa.

Paul Williams places this controversy in its Indian and Tibetan context. He traces in detail Mi pham's position in his commentary on the Bodhicaryavatara, the attack of one of his opponents, and his response, as well as indicating ways in which this controversy over the nature of awareness may be important within the context of Mi pham's rNying ma heritage of rDzogs chen thought and practice.

This book is the first book length study of its subject, and also includes a reprint of a previous paper by Williams on the reflective nature of awareness, as well as the relevant Tibetan texts from Mi pham. The book will be of interest to all students of Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka, as well as associated areas of Buddhist thought such as Yogacara and the philosophy of Dharmakirti. It will also be of value to those concerned with the intellectual foundations of rDzogs chen.

Reflexive Nature of Awareness: A Tibetan Madhyamaka Defence, Paul Williams, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Hardcover, 268 pages, $25.00

Dr. Paul Williams is Reader in Indo-Tibetan Studies, and Codirector of the Center for Buddhist Studies, University of Bristol, UK.

Contents:

Preface.

1. Introducing svasamvedana--and its two types.
2. Santaraksita on the reflexive nature of consciousness.
3. Madhyamakalamkara 16-17 in Prajnakaramati's Bodhicaryavatarapanjika on BCA 9: 21.
4. The verse.
5. Mi pham on Bodhicaryavatara 9:26 (Tib. 25).
6. The response of tre bo brag dkar sprul sku bLo bzang dpal idan bstan 'dzin.
7. Mi pham's reply.
8. Concluding note--why all the fuss?.

Appendices.

Bibliography.

Index.